Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.
Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA
The Mockingbird Foundation is a non-profit organization founded by Phish fans in 1996 to generate charitable proceeds from the Phish community.
And since we're entirely volunteer – with no office, salaries, or paid staff – administrative costs are less than 2% of revenues! So far, we've distributed over $2 million to support music education for children – hundreds of grants in all 50 states, with more on the way.
Review by Lovewillcarryusthrough
Been listening to phish podcasts lately. Particularly Attendance Bias(great job Dave Weinstein), and the HF pod’s 40 for 40. I overlooked Analyze Phish at first because even though it’s Harris and Aukerman and most likely hilarious, I assumed because it’s a decade old now that all the phish they’re talking about would be outdated. However, it dawned on me that as a nerdy stats fan, I sit around literally in my daily life talking about phish that is outdated. At times,forty years overcooked in fact. So I’m diving in this morning and this is the first piece of noteworthy information Harris gives us. His first show. Doesn’t look like anything spectacular. I will listen later. That being said, a “non-spectacular” phish show is still light years better than anything mainstream going on out there. In fact, it was a bunch of non-spectacular shows during 2.0 that got me hooked too. RIP Harris. Looking forward to hearing your first show and to hearing your podcast.